Kes Pemberian Tanah Di Selangor – Lebih 20 Tahun Lalu May 14, 2009
Posted by ibrahimbaba in Ketelusan, politik, Selangor.Tags: Bukit Botak, Khalid Ibrahim, Khir Toyo, Menteri Besar, pemberian tanah, politik, Selangor
1 comment so far
dari The Star
Plots given to five-year-olds and grassroots politicians
PETALING JAYA: At least two five-year-olds are among 81 youngsters who were allocated plots of land in a squatter resettlement area in Taman Selayang Mutiara, Selangor, in a land scam which began more than 20 years ago.
Hundreds of names of eligible original squatters in the Bukit Botak resettlement project, meanwhile, were deleted and replaced with those of people, some of whom are now only in their 20s.
These landowners were born between 1978 and 1980 — meaning they would have been between just five and seven when they were assigned the lots in 1985.
Plots were also given to outsiders, including some not from Selangor, who are obviously not entitled or qualified to get the land.
On top of that, plots were also given to grassroots politicians who were not squatters or even residing in the area.
The resettlement scheme started in 1985 when large tracts of land were pledged to the 1,634 original squatters. The names of 215 original squatters went missing from the land allocation list.
Of the 1,634 lots, 270 in Kampung Bendahara were given to the squatters who eventually settled there in 1990.
The remaining lots were assigned to squatter families by the state government in 1995 but they are still waiting for their lots.
The saga, that has been ongoing for over two decades now, has seen five Mentris Besar taking charge of the state, including the current administration of Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim.
Tan Sri Ahmad Razali Ali was Mentri Besar in 1985, followed by Tan Sri Muhammad Muhammad Taib (1986-1997), Tan Sri Abu Hassan Omar (1997-2000) and Datuk Seri Khir Toyo (2000-2008).
A special committee formed under Selangor Housing, Building Management and Squatters Committee chairman Iskandar Abdul Samad revealed that 81 of the landowners were under 18 years old. Of that number, 37 were below 12 when they were assigned the plots.
As the state government investigates how these people were given approval to own land in the scheme since 1985, allegations are being made that the names of the genuine squatters are missing from the original list of people to be compensated with land.
Some squatters claimed that 215 names of genuine settlers had been left out of the original list.
In a a special interview with a Star Probe Team, Iskandar said the state government was aware that plots had been allocated to children, youths, grassroots politicians and outsiders.
Although the land approvals were granted to these people since 1985, he said the titles were only issued from 2007 onwards.
Suspecting irregularities and discrepancies in the way the plots had been allocated, Iskandar said Khalid ordered the land office last year to stop giving out titles to the remaining people.
“We stopped issuing titles and only some 900 people have been successful in obtaining their titles so far. This is the best the state can do at this moment and it does not mean that we will not release the titles to the rest of the successful candidates.
“We give an assurance all those who are genuine applicants that they will get their titles,’’ he said.
Iskandar said the state was in a fix due to the fact that some of the titles had been given and it would be almost impossible to revoke them.
He said, however, that the state was looking into the legal aspects on how action could be taken against those who had obtained the titles illegally.
Barren land: Former squatters looking at the area in Bukit Botak where houses were to have been built. Until today there is still no sign of the project taking off
“We are serious about resolving the Bukit Botak squatters issue and will do everything possible to ensure justice is done,’’ he said.
Meanwhile, an earlier study by the Selangor State Development Corporation (PKNS) found that only 1,049 lots were available for distribution to the 1,364 squatter families.
The PKNS study showed that the names of 215 squatters who originally stayed in Bukit Botak were missing in the land allocation list of the 1,049 eligible applicants.
The original grants by the state government was a plot of 2,200 sq ft of land for each squatter family.
However, it was discovered that the names of certain grassroots politicians who were not squatters were among the 1,049 successful applicants, with some of them given plots of more than 3,000 sq ft, well above the official lot size.
Long list: Satar (left) and Kampung Selayang Baru Village Development and Security Committee chairman Azizan Md Ali showing the names of 81 people below the age of 18 who were allocated lots in Bukit Botak
Delpuri Corp Sdn Bhd, the contractor appointed to handle the Bukit Botak project, was given a 22,000 sq ft plot and also a 9.6ha of land as contra payment to build low and medium-cost houses costing RM42,000 to RM79,000.
Its general manager Ler Chang Koi said in an earlier statement that the company had not abandoned the project, but was told that the PKNS would take over.
“But, after three years, the PKNS itself was unable to finish the job and pushed the blame to our company, saying that it had abandoned the project,” he said.
‘’We are willing to complete the project. However, we need to get a letter of consent from PKNS or the state government,’’ Ler said.
PKNS public relations manager Mohd Wazir Abdul Gani said the corporation was only given a directive by the state government in December 2005 to take over the project.
“The PKNS had to follow the state directive and came up with a proposal to build houses costing only RM80,000 each, but only 20% of the squatters accepted the proposal,’’ he said.
According to Bukit Botak squatters spokesman Satar Md Saman, of the 1,364 lots for distribution, 270 have been given to those staying outside Selayang Baru while 160 lots were given to those who had never lived in Bukit Botak.
Krisis Perak: Isi hati rakyat Perak hanya mahukan pembubaran Dun! May 13, 2009
Posted by ibrahimbaba in Kerajaan, Perak, politik, Uncategorized.Tags: mahkamah, Menteri Besar, Nizar Jamaluddin, Perak, perlembagaan, Zambry Kadir
add a comment
sumber Harakahdaily
Krisis di Perak kembali rumit dan sempit, keputusan mahkamah yang umpama di ‘remote’ oleh Umno/BN mempermainkan semula jiwa dan denyut nadi rakyat.
Dalam masa sehari, mahkamah mudah diskripkan dengan memutar semula wajah demokrasi yang sebenar, rayuan Dr Zambry Kadir dengan pantas diproses dan diterima Mahkamah Rayuan dalam masa satu jam sahaja.
Walhal,secara amalan biasanya rayuan itu juga perlu tempoh tertentu untuk diputuskan perihal lulusnya dengan prosedur yang kepada ‘orang biasa’ akan menjafdi rumit.
Namun bagi Zambry yang juga proksi kepada Najib Tun Razak di Perak dalam ‘program realiti bertajuk rampasan kuasa di Perak’ mahkamah akan memudahkan rayuannya tidak seperti rakyat biasa yang lain.
Hanya sejam sahaja diperlukan Zambry yang menerima mandat Presiden Umno untuk mengemudi Umno di Perak untuk memutarkan semula skrip yang sedang bergelandangan di Perak.
Tindakan itu menyebabkan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi pada 11 Mei yang mengesahkan Dato’ Seri Ir Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin sebagai Menteri Besar yang sah ‘tergantung’ sementara, dan Zambry pula selaku MB ‘perampas’ kembali mahu duduk dikerusi empuknya dengan bantuan ‘jalan pintas’.
Nizar hanya duduk di kerusi MB pada 12 Mei setakat beberapa jam dan sempat hadir dalam Majlis Pengurniaan Pingat di Istana Iskandariah bersama Sultan Perak.
Namun, ketokohan Nizar selaku pejuang rakyat terserlah, tanpa ada rasa ‘lokek’ kepada kuasa, beliau dengan rendah diri mengosongkan semula pejabat MB yang baharu sahaja dimasuki semula 12 Mei.
Benar kata Adun Titi Serong, Dr Khalil Idham Lim Abdullah bahawa rakyat Perak kini mula curiga dan sangsi mahkamah hanya diperguna untuk kepentingan kuasa BN.
Mahkamah hanya menjadi ladang kepada kerakusan nafsu BN untuk melakukan apa sahaja walau ianya sah bertentangan dengan perlembagaan atau Undang-undang Tubuh Kerajaan Perak.
Ketegangan kini hanya boleh diselesaikan dengan kembali kepada rakyat, bak kata Nizar dan Pesuruhjaya PAS Perak, Ustaz Ahmad Awang bahawa pembubaran Dun adalah jalan terbaik.
Hal ini juga dipertegaskan Ahli Parlimen BN Gua Musang, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah dan bekas Pengerusi Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia (Suhakam), Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman
Usah dibodohkan kenyataan Ku Li dalam tulisan terbarunya, bekas pemimpin Parti Melayu Semangat 46 berkata kerajaan BN pimpinan Datuk Seri Zambry Abd Kadir lebih kurang tiga bulan “selama ini haram dan semua keputusan serta kontrak yang dibuat olehnya tanpa asas perundangan.”
Ku Li berpendirian sidang DUN Perak minggu lepas yang membawa usul Zambry menggantikan Speaker, V Sivakumar dengan R Ganesan, pemimpin kanan MIC negeri dan bekas ADUN Sungai, juga tidak sah.
“Sultan, dan sistem beraja itu sendiri, menanggung malu dengan babak (politik) ini, termasuk usaha terancang oleh sesetengah pihak untuk menyemarakkan lagi isu menjadi perkauman dan penderhakaan.
“Tindakan seumpama ini hanya merosakkan lagi institusi yang mereka dakwa cuba mempertahankannya, dan (susulan itu) ia mencemarkan Umno dan BN,” kata Ku Li.
Pastinya dalam kemelut ini, Sultan Perak adalah jawapan yang paling dekat kepada konflik ini untuk segera ditamatkan.Kuasa yang ada di tangan baginda adalah jalan penyudah, cadangan Ketua Penerangan PAS, Mahfuz Omar mudah, dua MB ini dipanggil mengadap Sultan Perak.
Tumpuan hanya satu, dua dua perlu akur akan penyelesaian hanya di gelanggang pilihan raya semula dan bukannya intepretasi undang-undang yang berbeza.
Kini rakyat menanti keazaman Sultan Perak untuk menamatkan segera sengketa ini dengan memperkenankan pembubaran Dun bagi membolehkan rakyat memilih semula wakil rakyat dan kerajaan secara sah.
Ramzi Diburu Kerana Mengugut Rosol? May 12, 2009
Posted by ibrahimbaba in Kerajaan, Kuala Terengganu, Melayu, politik, Terengganu, UMNO.Tags: Ahmad Said, boikot DUN, buruan polis, DUN, DUN Terengganu, Haji Hadi, Ibrahim Fikri, Idris Jusoh, Kuala Terengganu, Menteri Besar, peteh keting, Ramzi, SMS, SMS ugutan
add a comment
Maka Dr. Ramzi kini menjadi buruan polis bagi siasatan kes ugutan SMS kepada 3 orang ahli DUN Terengganu. Dari seorang setiausaha politik, kemudian kalah pilihanraya, akhirnya Datuk ini diburu polis. Apa hal ni?
Rakyat Terengganu umumnya menjadi tertanya-tanya:
- Ramzi bekas SetPol Idris Jusoh semasa menjawat MB dulu
- Ramzi kini diburu polis untuk siasatan kes SMS ugutan
- Ramzi dipilih oleh bosnya bertanding lawan Haji Hadi – mengenepikan Man Bakar (giant-killer yang pernah kalahkan Haji Hadi)
- Kes ugutan ialah pasal undi tidak percaya terhadap MB Ahmad Said
- 3 ahli DUN yang terima SMS ugutan adalah dikatakan penyokong Idris Jusoh
- 3 ahli DUN ini bersama beberapa lagi yang lain boikot sidang DUN kerana takut keselamatan mereka
- Dulu dikatakan SMS tersebut dikirim dari pejabat MB Ahmad Said – kini polis dah buktikan tidak benar
Tetapi bagi mereka yang sudah boleh baca mainan politik ini – sudah tersenyum akan pergerakan mereka …
Jadi siapa sebenarnya ugut siapa? Apakah benar ini perancangan yang lebih besar hasil permainan Idris? Semakin kita teliti semakin aneh pergolakan politik UMNO di Terengganu.
“Oghang barat duk berlawang dengan oghang timur oghang kite jugok merana” kata seorang pakcik ketika berceritakan pertelingkahan antara mereka yang meyokong kem Besut dan kem Kemaman. Yang mana secara kebetulan Terengganu sudah sekian lama di perintah dari antara tokoh-tokoh dari Besut dan Kemaman – yang mana pertelingkahan antara mereka subur sepanjang masa – dengan strategi “peteh keting” dan slogan “padang muka“. Yang merana akhirnya mereka di Kuala Terengganu. Apakah UMNO ketandusan ketokohan seperti Ibrahim Fikri?
Sedih melihat suasana begini. Apakah anak seorangbekas mufti terlibat dengan politik kotor sebegini?
Sekian, IB
Nizar MB Perak, permohonan tangguh keputusan oleh Zambry ditolak May 11, 2009
Posted by ibrahimbaba in Kehakiman, Kerajaan, Perak, politik.Tags: afidavit, Cecil Abraham, DUN, Hakim Aziz Rahim, Hanipa Maidin, mahkamah tinggi, MB sah, Menteri Besar, Nizar, Nizar Jamaluddin, Pakatan Rakyat, Perak, Sarawak, Stephen Kalong Ningkan, Sulaiman Abdullah, Zambry
2 comments
berita dipetik dari Harakahdaily
KUALA LUMPUR, 11 Mei (Hrkh) - Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur memutuskan Dato’ Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin ialah Menteri Besar Perak yang sah.
Keputusan yang dinanti-nantikan dengan penuh debaran oleh seluruh rakyat Malaysia diumumkan Hakim Abdul Aziz Abd Rahim.
Menurut Abdul Aziz, Menteri Besar hanya boleh dipecat melalui undi tidak percaya di Dewan Undangan Negeri dan beliau merujuk keputusan mahkamah terhadap kes Dato’ Stephen Kalong Ningkan.
Sementara itu permohonan peguam Zambry untuk menangguhkan keputusan tersebut bagi mengemukakan rayuan ditolak mahkamah.
Hakim Abdul Aziz dalam penghakiman yang dibacakan mulai jam 2.30 petang dan 
berakhir pada jam 2.50 petang tadi berpendapat, Sultan Perak sepatutnya menitahkan Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak bersidang bagi mengemukakan undi tidak percaya kepada Nizar selaku Menteri Besar.
Sambil merujuk kepada kes duluan (precedent) membabitkan Ketua Menteri Sarawak, Dato’ Stephen Kalong Ningkan pada 1966, beliau berpendapat Menteri Besar baru tidak wajar dilantik selagi Menteri Besar sedia ada belum meletakkan jawatan.
Beliau juga berpuashati bahawa Nizar tidak pernah melepaskan jawatannya sebagai Menteri Besar Perak yang sah seperti didakwa para peguam Zambry.
Para peguam Nizar dalam penghujahan mereka sebelum ini menegaskan bahawa jika Nizar diisytiharkan sebagai Menteri Besar yang sah, beliau akan mendapatkan 
perkenan Sultan Perak untuk membubarkan Dun Perak bagi membolehkan pilihan raya negeri diadakan.
Pakatan Rakyat dan BN kini masing-masing mempunyai 28 kerusi di Dun Perak.
Pada Pilihan Raya Umum ke-12 Mac 2008, PAS, DAP dan KeADILan yang kemudiannya membentuk Pakatan Rakyat memenangi 31 daripada 59 kerusi Dun Perak.
Bagaimanapun tiga Adun Pakatan Rakyat pada 4 Februari lalu telah mengisytiharkan diri sebagai calon Bebas dan menyokong BN selepas hilang secara misteri selama lima hari.
Nizar ketika ditemui pemberita berkata akan segera memohon menghadap Sultan Perak bagi memohon perkenan membubarkan Dun Perak dan membuka laluan kepada 
pilihan raya negeri bagi mendapatkan mandat baru rakyat.
Nizar memfailkan kesnya 13 Februari lalu supaya mahkamah mengisytiharkan beliau sebagai Menteri Besar yang sah.
Beliau dilantik Menteri Besar pada 17 Mac 2008.
Bagaimanapun ekoran tindakan khianat tiga Adun Pakatan Rakyat itu, BN yang mendakwa mendapat majoriti di Dun Perak telah menghadap Sultan bagi membentuk kerajaan negeri.
Tidak memperkenankan permohonan Nizar untuk membubarkan Dun, Sultan Azlan 
Shah telah berkenan melantik Zambry sebagai Menteri Besar yang baru pada 6 Februari lalu.
Nizar dalam afidavitnya berkata, beliau masih Menteri Besar atas alasan tidak ada sebarang undi tidak percaya dibuat terhadapnya dalam Dun dan beliau juga tidak meletak jawatan.
Zambry diwakili peguam Datuk Cecil Abraham, Sunil Abraham dan Farah Shuhadah Razali. Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail bertindak sebagai pencelah.
Nizar diwakili Sulaiman Abdullah, Mohamed Hanipa Maidin dan beberapa peguam kanan.
Kelab Penyokong BN Memperakui Kejahatan Mereka Selama Ini April 19, 2009
Posted by ibrahimbaba in Kerajaan, Kuala Terengganu, politik, UMNO.Tags: Ahmad Said, MB Terengganu, Menteri Besar, penyokong BN, Terengganu
add a comment
Akhirnya mereka sendiri memperakui kejahatan yang selalu mereka lakukan selama ini. Cuma bezanya kali ini ialah mereka lakukan terhadap sesama mereka dari puak yang berlawanan dengan mereka.Selalunya yang menjadi mangsa ialah parti lawan atau orang awam yang dituduh menjadi penyokong parti lain dari mereka.
Kali ini Kelab Penyokong BN Terengganu telah membuka pekung mereka sendiri apabila menuduh puak Ahmad Said yang memerintah bertindak jahat dengan memecat serta menukar mana-mana pegawai kerajaan dan GLC Terengganu yang tidak bersama puak mereka atau yang menyebelahi puak lawan mereka dalam parti yang sama. Termasuk dalam tindakan jahat dikatakan juga sesetengah mereka ini ada yang kena turun pangkat.
Laporan The Star hari ini menceritakan semua ini. Antaranya:
“… drastic step of removing, demoting and redesignating senior officers of state-linked companies and agencies …”
“… Ahmad’s decision to stop the uniform aid to schoolchildren”
hinggakan amaran bunuh!
“… were also upset when three of their peers received death threats purportedly originating from the Mentri Besar’s office …”
Mana satu yang benar? Kalau pejabat MB nafikan bermakna 3 yang menerima amaran tersebut berBOHONG!
Sekian, IB
—
The Star, Sunday April 19, 2009
MB failed to explain raft of changes, says club
KUALA TERENGGANU: Mentri Besar Datuk Ahmad Said’s failure to explain his drastic step of removing, demoting and redesignating senior officers of state-linked companies and agencies may be one reason for his fallout with the 10 Barisan Nasional assemblymen.
Another reason, claimed the Terengganu Barisan Nasional Supporters Club, was Ahmad’s decision to stop the uniform aid to schoolchildren.
Club secretary Alias Abdullah said what Ahmad did sowed resentment on the ground.
“I don’t think ties would have soured if the Mentri Besar had briefed the state assemblymen properly on the reasons for his actions,” said Alias, who is also the Alur Limbat assemblyman.
Ahmad had earlier removed and re-designated many state senior officers. They included chief executive officers of state-owned companies, while several top government officials felt that they had been demoted when they were re-assigned to head less important agencies.
Alias said the assemblymen were also caught in a bind when they could not explain why some aid to the constituents were stopped.
He claimed that Ahmad ignored the difficult situation of the state assemblymen.
Alias said the 10 assemblymen were also upset when three of their peers received death threats purportedly originating from the Mentri Besar’s office, leading them to stay away from the second day of State Legislative Assembly proceedings.
In another development, state police chief Senior Asst Comm Datuk Sukhri Dahlan said investigations into the death threats were still in progress.
